“Truthfulness, verifiability, neutrality, … or what I learned to stay away from coffee, to avoid engaging in endless discussions that ended hogging all my time and left me beaten. I clarify this for someone you used to save the read. In any case the issue seems fundamental to Wikipedia, its future and credibility. I copy what I put in a dediscusi n page: Search erase late I think I delete the query, which makes me frustrated, I understand that for two reasons. First, I spent several hours investigating the case, and I suspect that few pay attention to the issue have come to see the result of my effort, so I am not aware has been taken into account in practice, the case seems irrefutable , as now indicate, but only Chuck Norris has submitted its opinion to the contrary, with arguments that seem irrelevant to the case.Second, Wikipedia should not be used as a means of promoting a business, and few cases have been clearer: the subject is incompetent from the scientific point and I guess that doctor is no reason to doubt the legitimacy of some of their titles (I seems a case of police court), as although not impossible to 100 of good faith in the proceedings which led to his doctorate in biology, the more parsimonious hypothesis is that there was improper conduct and multiple complications.I saw a new tactic: if you can not see that your account is of particular purpose, change ‘above’ to ‘mostly’ maybe ‘to’ maybe ‘and’ too ‘for’ also ‘in the odd hundred articles before putting your (or your) posting .– LP (Talk) 15:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC) In recent days I have found involved in another case, in discussing Neocatechumenal, with the result a warning for me and the blocking of another or, to defend by argument, and a commendable patience, the Neocatechumenal be described primarily as an organization or company (Neocatechumenal Way), and you can not begin the article by saying that is an itinerary and concealing an association of persons.RoyFocker, with whom I had a good relationship and I always seemed to dialogue, warned blocked by lack of respect for the speaker ( “I’ll sincerely ask that you avoid this kind of provocation”) by saying: “Did I miss I do something, or the Neocatechumenal is part of the Catholic Church Are you going to deny that “. Then it was blocked by Netito: ‘:: Do not you stop accusing them of lying and conspiracy, and all that … So you’re locked three days since you were warned. Net’ito) (22:58 31 Aug 2008 (UTC) “strongly advised to review the differential and, better still, the whole debate. This particular case has made me remember a little story of Jardiel Poncela in which a friend tells another in disbelief that these seemingly gentle old ladies across the gate of the park are actually beasts let loose, and it shows in recently, by the simple process of question them repeatedly with a “hey, tiger!”.I do not remember clearly, but I think that eventually the guard came and took the old people roaring. In this case he has failed to roar and foam, but some ironic or angry response, I think more than justified. I do not know if this tactic taught in any organization. I came here three years ago with the intention of bringing in the issues of Zoology and Botany, and Natural Science, where I write almost without consultation, but I started to “patrol” and enter the community, consultation deletion of Bach Flowers, … I found myself spending hours studying for every minute spent ing (from what I have gained much) and trapped in the effort to avoid that Wikipedia is the perfect ad needed by all the charlatans and all sects.I know there are two ways to interpret my current annoyance: First, I am a paranoid obsessed confusing his views with the truth, and second, they are actually gaining control of Wikipedia, or in the provinces I visited, the vendors of all stripes. So instead took weeks wondering what belongs to truth, objectivity, on Wikipedia. For objectivity understand the difference between what anyone can see and what you can see only the chosen few, which may be questioned in relation to the reality that surrounds us, and what is not, because it belongs to the inner self. I assume that for me, and I need to know whether to Wikipedia as well, there is a difference between knowing and believing, between belief justified, empirical corroboration, or believe otherwise, only with faith, without justification, in obedience to an ancient tradition faith in the authority of a prophet is not moot, or because it gives us our left ventricle.

Price convergence The arbitration has the effect of making the prices of assets in different markets converge. As a result of arbitration, exchange rates, the price of goods and the price of financial instruments tend to converge in all markets. The speed at which prices converge is a measure of market efficiency. Arbitrage tends to reduce price discrimination, motivating people to buy a product where the price is low and where resale is higher. The arbitration moves the currencies of the countries to the”purchasing power parity.” For example, assume that a car bought in the U.S. is cheaper than the same car in Canada (ignoring transportation costs, taxes and regulations across countries). Canadians seize the opportunity and cross the border to buy cars in the U.S. and bring them to Canada. Some of these buyers buy cars for resale in Canada.Thus, Canadians would have to buy U.S. dollars to buy the cars, and this, in a large scale, would cause the U.S. dollar to appreciate against the Canadian dollar. Reached a point where the U.S. dollar price is so high that it will not be attractive for Canadians buying cars in the U.S., reaching the point of purchasing power parity. Similarly, arbitrage affects the difference between interest rates that governments pay various debt bonds.

the microenvironment of the Company is assessed by the Competition Model Larger Model distinguishes the different factors causing influences on the Company. These actors are: Suppliers who negotiate higher prices, direct competition which measures the intensity of rivalry in the sector, customers who are forced down prices, and integrity. Collateral is what is the immediate environment to the Company, located in the vicinity of the departments of the company. Intra marketing to make it all work for the market. Marketing intermediaries would be another important group, are what enable the company to remain with the value chain to final consumer. Would the wholesale and retail distributors, logistics companies, and so on. The marketing services agencies, telemarketing, market research institutes, etc.. And finally the financial services. Another important sector providers would microenvironment.They would also be included, customers, competitors and stakeholders (interest groups in the business)

Many critics say that in common such theory can be a “hoax” because in the articles of Duncan is assumed that the peak power per capita was 11.15 boe / c / year in 1979, but other data show that since that date to an increase in that figure to 12.12 boe / c / year .. This is in contradiction with the postulate of the theory in which the energy per capita grew from 1979 to 2008.
Diagram of power consumption in the year 2006 according to the website of the EDRO
Another fact that can be observed and that is not consistent with the prediction that coal replace oil in the year 2005 can be seen in the page where EDRO for 2006 oil still accounted for 35.27 as a source of consumption, while coal still accounts for 28.02 , while at the same website admits the growing use of coal compared to oil. Also in the BP Global website in the way of graphics power tool can be seen that within the year 2007 consumption of oil is a slight decrease of 3939.4 to 3927.9 Mtoe Mtoe but still higher compared to coal, But unlike oil, there is an increase in consumption of coal during the same period of 3194.5 to 3303.7 Mtoe Mtoe.
Proponents note that the current trend of rising per capita energy consumption can be difficult to sustain in light of the evidence provided by the limits of finite resources like oil, coal and natural gas. They argue that this lack of capacity to give a prediction that makes the other predictions are unreliable, and noted that others frequently cite only the warnings of the theory without giving dates.
Roughly one can distinguish some or all opponents of the theory.
Critics object to any single part of the theory relating to the event date or cultural bias of American conservatism noticed especially the principle of attraction. But generally conclude that the more general principle of the peak oil theory, the land carrying capacity and reuse of coal as a primary source is feasible in some degree.
Some environmentalists are more optimistic in their hopes that alternative energy neomalthusianos despise as fusion energy, geothermal energy and other low or zero levels of contamination. Say they have data like population growth without taking into account the panoramas that open the many social and technological change to solve problems, such as alternative energy and radical changes in lifestyle that may impact minority that theory predicts. Meanwhile, the doomsday scenarios anarcoprimitivistas see this as a painful road that leads to civilization.
Critics generally divided among total persons belonging to extremes of the political spectrum.
Distribution of countries by coal production in 2007
The left-wing anarchists and socialists propose that these theories are lies or exaggerations that benefit the speculation in order to sell an expensive resource that appears to be exhausted in order to perpetuate the dominant classes. Seen as an elitist agenda of the formulations of the oil peak, the thoughts of war, catastrophe and the neomaltusianismo.
The ultra-neoliberal cornucopianos are arguing that population growth, resource scarcity and its potential polluters are exaggerations or lies, one of them counting the occurrence of peak oil or the environmental devastation of coal.
Traditional conservatives and nationalists focus only on the temporal benefit of the cultures before the impact to the environment, are often not openly deny the peak oil or the Olduvai theory but often omit some or all of the theory. It’s easy, and indeed according to the theory it predicts that most countries of the world are taken by this line and move from oil to coal or nuclear power as a United States or China regardless of the ecological consequences. Many countries, like the first mundistas also tend to categorize this theory over other countries and third world, often seen as an attempt to dominate.

Hindustan Times
COMMENT ON THIS! Your opinion! The Bombay High Court directed Reliance Industries to supply gas to a group of former company at about half of the government-approved price, sending its shares sliding more than 7 percent.

The Hindu
Check the prices: The minister of petroleum and natural gas, Mr Murli Deora after a meeting with the Minister for Finance, Mr Pranab Mukherjee, in the capital on Monday.

Related Products
Trading Natural Gas: Cash, Futures, Options and Swaps by Fletcher J. Sturm (Hardcover – Jan 1997)	Classic Natural Gas Industry Film DVD: 1959 Vintage Natural Gas Energy Production, Exploration, & Products Film (DVD – 2006)	Petroleum Economics: Issues and Strategies of Oil and Natural Gas Production by Rognvaldur Hannesson (Kindle Edition – Oct 30, 1998) – Kindle Book