Work And Capitalism

Friedrich Engels on the paper of the work presents in them as the evolucionistas scientific theories of Darwin and La marks demonstrates that the man creating the work created it exactly itself. Example clearly is the development of the member of the hand, that is not alone work agency, but fruit of it, in adaptativo process. Its studies conclude that the work in them made social beings, developing the thought and the feelings in the social relations. The example of the communication: it speaks, considered a gigantic one evolution and differentiation of the man of the other animals.

Thousands and thousands of years had made in them to live in society and for the work we were knowing the diverse forms of interaction and development. Of the elaboration of instruments, we saw the hunting it fishes and, of this we saw it the agriculture and the sprouting of the great dispute, until today in the current societies, the private property, later we saw the arts, sciences, politics and religion. At this rate the head that planned already was capable to compel the work the other people’s hands. It was as soon as we know the slavery, as production way. The work if developed historically and therefore it generated immediate consequences and mediate unexpected for it carried out who it at the time.

Chilean Capital

Evo Allende Evo Morales is the first Socialist elected President of Bolivia, as in 1970 was allende in relation to Chile. Barely 100 years after the birth of Allende met, Morales suffered an electoral defeat in the capital when the Prefecture was won by a pro-derecha indigenous dissident. The opposition wants to get Palace Evo but without a pinochetazo. USA already defeated the Soviet bloc and, instead of promoting anti-communist military dictatorships as it did in the early 1970s, seeks to stabilize democratically to your backyard and prefers to remove non-conformist Governments with legalistic maneuvers. Allende never reached 50% of the votes, something that Evo surpassed in General and constituent elections.

While Allende was under more pressure of the Soviet Union and Leninist Marxists, the social basis of Evo is more indigenous. If the Chilean opposition was strong in the capital, the Bolivian wants fencing to La Paz evista on the basis of the earliest departments to It is. Evo could face its rivals considering nationalizing the oligarchy, but he has taken as a lesson of the fall of allende that he may not cause much to us by what must combine a red speech with agreements with opposition pro-FTA. He fears that if you opt for a radical path could be overthrown, but the right also knows how to take advantage of their hesitations to be yendole by removing social bases with a decentralist preaching. Anti-capitalist anticapitalinos vs Bolivia is jaloneada by two extremes. On one side are the anti-capitalist trade unionists who want to radicalize the process and accuse Morales of not much increase wages or not wanting to confiscate the oligarchy and imperialism. On the opposite side are cambas regionalists and chapacos that promote historical resentment against the capital in fact (though not in law) that is La Paz, and in their demands for autonomy want that their departments will follow policies pro-free market. Within trade unions and of the boards of High and low income areas, grow those who pose to break the power of capital, while within the least Highlands departments grow those who want to break the power of the capital. The first way would lead to go towards a social revolution that ends by spill over and disrupt Morales. The second path involves going desafilando and removing power to the central Government up to finish removing it by one that can better develop capitalism.

Carlos Marxs Capital

University national autonomous of MEXICO Faculty of philosophy and letters seminar MONOGRAPH of philosophy politics MARX today PhD student: JOSe LUIS chain MONTENEGRO, M.Sc. Professor: Dr. Cesareo Morales Mexico D.F. November 2004. THE first section CAPITAL: Commodity and currency few works in the history of humanity have been controversial permanent and translated into so many languages by its impact on the daily life of the man.

It is the Capital one of those works in which perhaps, unintentionally, Carlos Marx left a legacy of empirical knowledge, scientific and others, which have been interpreted several times during more than one century and that today, faced with the apparent failure of capitalism as an economic system, incapable of the most basic problems of humanity seems to be back. Is such the amount of printed works of the Capital since 1946 in the past century, the Marx-Engels-Lenin Institute in Moscow began to register the variants of different original editions of the work and the preparatory materials, many of them still unpublished, which served as basis in order to rescue the truly scientific. It is necessary to note then, that translations and philosophical interpretations of Marx have been impregnated with ideology and extreme passion and therefore in not a few cases, the exaggerations and inaccuracies play definite role in different versions on the same theme. It is clear if the theories put forth in this work, deepened and still maintain the class struggle around the essential elements of the discussion, is worth say, land, labour and capital. Although Carlos Marx was who demonstrated more clearly than the envelope unpaid worker manual or intellectual work constitutes the added value or the profits of capital, however, other economists had already vaguely the fact. Thus for example, said Ricardo: the integer value of the articles of the settler and the manufacturing is divided into two portions alone; one form it the profits of capital, while the Another is enshrined in the wage of the workers. .