The authors make the assumption that "the demand is constant." In their original thinking, it means simply that the money supply is constantly on the product. Although it may be constant demand, if you change the price? After all, they always convince us that the demand depends on price and the price on demand! And then it turns out that demand in general does not depend on the price! Understand – as you want … And if these (fantasticheskih!) conditions Fri shrinking it is clear that the rise in prices will occur. For the same amount of money will account for fewer and fewer goods. Buyers will pick the goods from the hands, and sellers to immediately raise prices. In contrast, the increase in supply will accompanied by falling prices for a fixed AP. Since the buyer's position will improve. They immediately feel their advantage and will not rush to pay the same price if you can buy cheaply.
That is why both cases, the dependence of prices on offer feedback, and it contradicts the so-called law of supply. And demand is not under any circumstances can not remain unchanged if the price changes due to changes Fri Proposal Money can be taken constant, but demand will necessarily vary with the price. Because he was always and automatically linked to money supply and price of goods. Instead of a conclusion – a small quote from the textbook "Economic theory (political economy)" under the editorship of acad. VI Vidyapin (4 th ed. – M.: INFRA-M, 2007.
P. 144). To illustrate the relationship of our economists to the "laws" of economics. Determination of price by supply and demand, and along with it definition of demand and supply prices is compounded by the fact that demand determines supply and, conversely, the proposal defines the demand, production determined by the market and the market – production. This process of permutations theses and arguments, cause and effect leads economists to a standstill. " Where is the exit from this impasse?! Why did not seek professional economists?