Montranus Media Fund I And II

Another OLG investors said to have repayment of equity to the higher regional court of Stuttgart now also the higher regional court of Munich (judgment of January 24, 2012) has an investor a Montranus Media Fund and to the reversal of the media fund contribution guilty which Helaba Dublin. In the Centre of the judgment which was once again at the Montranus Fund I + II for the concluded loan agreements or bearer bonds related cancellation policy, which does not meet the statutory requirements. Loan contracts with the HELABA Dublin can still withdraw are LEASING for private investors on Montranus Media Fund I for investors from the Hanover + II this has resulted in that they can still revoke the financing agreements concluded with Helaba Dublin to fund of funds (loan agreement or promissory notes). On the basis of this revocation of Montranus investors can fund from the Bank the repayment of equity capital employed less preserved Charge distributions. Some courts have the Montranus investors Additionally awarded lost profits. In return, they must transmit their participation in the Montranus Fund to Helaba Dublin.

We claim this for many investors the Montranus Media Fund I and II. Compensation claims against savings banks because of secret kickbacks in the years 2003 to 2005 have in particular savings banks advised their customers to subscribe for investments to the Montranus Media Fund in that the savings banks have received commissions called refunds or kickbacks for providing the Fund investments, their customers were not informed. The Kickback case-law of the Bundesgerichtshof, uninformed investors can enforce claims against the savings bank Advisory it. Want to know how you can reduce the damage incurred in connection with their Montranus Media Fund participation en and get back their invested capital?

Tags: ,

Comments are closed.