The Russian Revolution

Thus the Bolchevique revolution obtained, with the support of the Russian people, to survive to the confrontations initials with the forces against-you would revolutionize. For Hobsbawm they are the three reasons for this success: first it disciplines it centralizadora of the Communist Party with its thousand of organized members, according to capacity of bolcheviques in keeping territorial unit Russian e, third, bocheviques had taken care of to one old claim of the majority of the population delivering the land for the campesinato. With the power conquered in Russia international the communist movement was felt inspired in this first experience, however, some attempts as in Germany, Bulgaria, Brazil, etc., they had not obtained to reach its objectives same being co-ordinated for communist parties that, in its majority, had been born after-1917 inhaled in bolcheviques and guided for the International 3Associao of the Workers, the Communist International call. After some failed experiences of taking of being able for the Communists of other countries through attempts of revolutions, only during World War II, with the victories of Red army of the Ussr, had occurred raises in the countries dominated for the nazistas. These you raise had been led by the local communist parties that had been almost that the only focos of resistance to the Germans. NY Governor might disagree with that approach.

Hobsbawm analyzes that the biggest conquest of bolcheviquesfoi the fact to have influenced all a generation and to have formed in this generation the certainty that ‘ ‘. .os days of Capitalism were inevitably contados’ ‘ (Hobsbawm, 1995, P. 79). Exactly with the death of its leader greater, Lnin, and the posterior dispute between Stalin and Trotski, international the communist movement continued and continues to have the Russian Revolution as its bigger paradigm. When affirming that ‘ ‘ In short, the history of Brief Century XX cannot be understood without the Russian Revolution and its effect right-handers and indiretos’ ‘ (1995, P. 89), the historian Eric Hobsbawm demonstrates the basic importance to understand all the aspects of the Russian Revolution all to understand the direction of the world contemporary.

The Russian Revolution mark, for two authors, one of more important moments of century XX. When analyzing the workmanships of the two authors we can perceive that some points of convergence exist on the subject, however, same interpretations are the differences in these on the Russian Revolution that we look for to detach. Exactly keeping the had differentiations of the workmanship of Cotrim for if dealing with a didactic book directed toward average education, in ‘ ‘ It was of the Extremos’ ‘ the immediate objectives of bolcheviques are evidentes what it facilitates the understanding of the events that if had followed 1917 after and the isolation orbit point of the Ussr during World War II. This assay more made possible the analysis of a workmanship wide used in the courses of graduation in the area of sciences human beings with a didactic book of one of the used authors in our country, resulting in a very important activity so that if it can observe the limits of the didactic book and the necessity of the permanent reading of workmanships come back toward the academic area of ours disciplines.